Yours is NOT to Question "Why???"

June 30, 2005 2:19 AM | Permalink | Comments (4)

I was given a pair of hand-crafted underwear yesterday. They are made of a cotton knit festooned with a cheerful paleontological pattern in primary and secondary colours.

I might have ended up with two pairs, but the second crotch was misplaced. It was found eventually in the dog's bed, but by then the moment was gone.

4 Comments

Chuck said:

You DO have two pairs of underwear, there is not anything about being crotchless that disqualifies the second pair as being defined underwear. More accurately, you have two types of underwear. The real question is what was the dog doing with your underwear? Soon Lark will be receiving mailings from the likes of Victoria's Secret or the "Hollywood" place I purchased the famous edible underwear from (yet another type of underwear.

June 30, 2005 9:28 AM

Goddess said:

Picture please! Remember, the second pair could come in handy some day.

July 1, 2005 2:41 AM

Kate said:

But the second pair, apparently (or a-" pair"-ently - ha ha?) didn't exist yet. It was merely the pieces of said potential underwear. The other part of the underwear must already exist (according to that well-known theorem) in order for them to be "crotchless." Is that not indeed the case?

Ah, the memories. I shall never forget the famous �??edible�?� underwear, which, incidentally, disappeared under mysterious circumstances after being given to a friend. Nor shall I forget the golden toothbrush. And that slogan �?? �??More, More, MORE!�?� that helped you win the aforementioned items.

But I still think that someone dressed in an enormous shopping bag costume does NOT fit the description of �??secret shopper.�?� �??BLATANT Shopper,�?� perhaps �?? �??Secret Shopper,�?� no way. Besides �?? there was a REAL secret shopper (who went about performing evaluations on the sales staff in the various mall shoppes �?? I got a very high rating, by the way) �?? and I am concerned that the enormous shopping bag could have given the REAL secret shopper a bad name.

July 2, 2005 3:43 AM

Chris

said:

I seem to remember that around the time the edible underwear "mysteriously" disappeared, my mom packed us some pretty bland fruit leather in our lunches...

Also, i don't think that a shopping bag makes for a good "Shopper" secret or otherwise. A shopping bag does no shopping. It only comes into play after all the shopping has taken place. Maybe if you introduced some court lingo it could be "Shopper After the Fact" as it aids the shopper with the getaway.

July 2, 2005 7:56 PM